Showing posts with label wickets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wickets. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

England lose sixth one-day international in Sydney by two wickets as Australia take 5-1 series lead

For all the longueurs of the past month, this tour has already gone down as a historic achievement by Andrew Strauss’ England. But Strauss and company have now created history for the wrong reasons as they failed to defend a total of 333 - the highest score they have ever made in defeat.

The Commonwealth Bank series has uncanny echoes of the summer of 2009, when a 6-1 defeat in the one-dayers made an anti-climactic postscript to England’s Ashes success. If their losing streak continues on Sunday, in the final match at the WACA, they will duplicate the scoreline this year.

On a sweltering night in Sydney, the match reached a breathless finish - and not just because the heat and humidity were so oppressive. In the final over of the match, Australian tailender John Hastings lined up a big drive at Chris Woakes, only for the ball to come flashing off his inside edge and down to the boundary for four runs that no fielding captain could possibly have blocked.

It was a cruel end for England, because that ball was probably only a quarter-inch from sneaking through and perhaps even bowling Hastings. There were already eight men out, and with only Shaun Tait left to do the job, Australia could perhaps have faltered on the final step. But England should have really closed the match out much earlier after Jonathan Trott had posted 137 - the second-highest individual score for an English batsman against Australia.

The aggregate of runs - 667 in the match - was the second-highest for any one-day international in Australia, and provided great entertainment for the crowd (even if only 19,479 turned out, leaving the Sydney Cricket Ground around half full). The ball kept flashing to the boundary all night, but it was probably the extra muscle behind Australia’s batsmen - who hit five sixes between them, as opposed to none for England - that made the difference.

If England have discovered a one-day star in this series, it must be Trott.

He would probably have started out as 12th man, had it not been for Paul Collingwood’s catastrophic loss of form. But he has now gathered 361 runs at an average of 72. At the present rate of progress, he is on track to become the fastest one-day batsman to 1000 runs, beating a record set by Viv Richards all the way back in 1980.

That “fastest” applies to the number of innings, not the rate of scoring. An accumulator rather than a dominator, Trott ticks along as quietly and invisibly as a personal pension plan. There were 64 singles in his innings, but only 39 dots - an impressively low ratio out of the 126 balls he faced.

But on such a sultry day, which Strauss described as “one of the hottest I have ever batted on”, flickering to and fro has its disadvantages. Trott was already cramping up in his 70s. Soon after completing his hundred, he had to call for a runner.

Australia’s captain Michael Clarke challenged the umpires on this point, perhaps recalling Strauss’ refusal to allow Graeme Smith a runner when he cramped up during the 2009 Champions Trophy. But the International Cricket Council changed their guidelines on this last year, so Trott was not only allowed to stop running, but could then return to field and bowl four overs during Australia’s innings. This was a useful bonus, as Collingwood was unavailable after suffering a back spasm.

Collingwood’s absence from England’s fielding effort was significant in all sorts of ways. First, it was another reminder that this seven-match series is stressing both sides beyond physical endurance. (Australia’s Steve Smith was another man to require a runner after tweaking a hip muscle.)

Second, it highlighted the danger of going into a match with no spare bowler - which is how England would line up in the World Cup if they persist in their strategy of using Collingwood at No 7. Third, it might well have cost England victory, as his bowling would probably have been more economical than the combined work of Trott and Kevin Pietersen, who conceded 72 from their 10 overs.

Mind you, Woakes clocked up 73 against his name, and James Anderson - usually Mr Reliable - had figures of 10-0-91-1, the second-worst in England’s history after Steve Harmison’s 10-0-97-0 against Sri Lanka.

Every one of Australia’s top seven batsmen made at least 20, including Mitchell Johnson, who was promoted to No 4 and bashed a lively 59.

Clarke all but carried Australia home with 82, his best innings of the whole summer, before he was run out in the penultimate over.

England lose sixth one-day international in Sydney by two wickets as Australia take 5-1 series lead England,sixth,oneday,international,Sydney,wickets,Australia,series http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/international/england/8298274/England-lose-sixth-one-day-international-in-Sydney-by-two-wickets-as-Australia-take-5-1-series-lead.html

Andrew Strauss reflects on 'bitter' defeat as England lose sixth ODI against Australia by two wickets

"And 333 is a good score on any ground. It was a good wicket but obviously we were not helped by Paul Collingwood not being able to bowl.

"We let them get off to far too fast a start and they were able to keep up the rate. It was very, very disappointing we were unable to restrict them to less than 333. But all credit to the way they played. In the end they walked out worthy winners."

As for Collingwood's situation, Strauss said: "He's okay. He had a back spasm so hopefully should recover fairly quickly. Otherwise, the rest of us got through the game okay."

England's one-day form ahead of the World Cup gives cause for concern, however. The team has been weakened by a rash of injury setbacks, with bowlers Graeme Swann, Tim Bresnan and Ajmal Shahzad all currently injured.

They should all return for the tournament on the subcontinent, starting next month, which will afford England the chance to field a stronger bowling line-up.

"I think in the World Cup we'll have to think about what the best balance is," Strauss said. "We thought this was the best balance to win this game of cricket.

"And when you score 333 that should be enough but all credit to how Australia played."

Strauss suggested the series against Australia has provided few pointers for how England should line up at the World Cup.

"It hasn't really because we've had lots of injuries and haven't been able to play our best side. That was the same for Australia as well.

"I think we've got a lot of talent in our one-day squad and I think we can do a lot of good things in the World Cup."

Trott had reason to see the match in more of a bittersweet light.

"Obviously it's nice to get a hundred," Trott said. "But it's more memorable when you win the game.

"Unfortunately we couldn't come away with a win today. You'd take 333 at the beginning of the day if you were given that."

Australia captain Michael Clarke showed the way with an impressive 82 in front of his home Sydney crowd.

"I thought we batted really well," Clarke said. "I did think 333 was going to be tough to get."

Clarke promoted Mitchell Johnson to bat at No 4 and was rewarded as the paceman scored a rapid 57.

"We had to take a few risks. I guess I punted on Mitch going up the order and trying to smack a few and he batted really well," Clarke said.

"He strikes a ball as clean as anyone and he's shown again tonight that when he gets his opportunity he's not only a very good bowler, he can do some damage with the bat as well.

"To be able to come out and chase those runs, I'm stoked with that win."

Andrew Strauss reflects on 'bitter' defeat as England lose sixth ODI against Australia by two wickets Andrew,Strauss,reflects,bitter,defeat,England,sixth,against,Australia,wickets http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/international/england/8298411/Andrew-Strauss-reflects-on-bitter-defeat-as-England-lose-sixth-ODI-against-Australia-by-two-wickets.html